Like most of us I have been aware of the Dilbert cartoon series for a long time. I have read it occasionally and, for the most part, have not understood its appeal or even its point.
Thanks to the Instapundit I have been treated to a series of links to the web site of Dilbert's creator, Scott Adams, since President Trump began his run for office. I have linked to him before.
His explanations of how Trump accomplished his amazing political feat have been fascinating to me.
I watched the President's press conference on Thursday for a little while. I was mostly impressed. I stopped watching at the point that he said, and I paraphrase, "No matter what I say today all the news tomorrow will be about me ranting and raving. I am not ranting." Taking his bait, as usual, this was Friday's Huffington Post cover for their reporting.
I mentioned above Mr. Adams fascinating explanation of Trump's success. In this post Mr. Adams provides a plausible explanation for another phenomenon, that apparently sane and intelligent people people can come away from the same experience with two completely different interpretations of what occurred.
With reference to HP's complete failure to predict Trump's success and the fact that they saw an entirely different press conference than I did he writes:
"When reality violates your ego that rudely, you either have to rewrite
the movie in your head to recast yourself as an idiot, or you rewrite
the movie to make yourself the hero who could see what others missed".
Read the whole thing.